Possible present day habitats for life on Mars (Including potential Mars special regions): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 163:
Another paper published in 2012 uses cluster analysis [[cluster analysis]] and suggested once more that they may have detected biological activity.<ref name="Bianciardi-2012">{{cite journal |last=Bianciardi |first=Giorgio |last2=Miller |first2=Joseph D. |last3=Straat |first3=Patricia Ann |last4=Levin |first4=Gilbert V. |title=Complexity Analysis of the Viking Labeled Release Experiments |url=http://central.oak.go.kr/repository/journal/11315/HGJHC0_2012_v13n1_14.pdf|journal=IJASS |date=March 2012 |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=14–26 |bibcode=2012IJASS..13...14B |doi=10.5139/IJASS.2012.13.1.14 |accessdate=2012-04-15|quote= These analyses support the interpretation that the Viking LR experiment did detect extant microbial life on Mars }}</ref><ref name="NGS-20120413">{{cite news |last=Than |first=Ker |title=Life on Mars Found by NASA's Viking Mission? |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/04/120413-nasa-viking-program-mars-life-space-science/ |date=2012-04-13 |work=[[National Geographic (magazine)|National Geographic]] |accessdate=2013-07-16 }}</ref>
 
On the other hand, a paper published in 2013 by Quinn has refined the chemical explanations suggested for the labeled release observations, using radiation damaged perchlorates. By simulating the radiation environment on Mars, he was able to duplicate radioactive <sup>14</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> emission from the sample.<ref name=Quine2013>[httphttps://wwwweb.archive.org/web/20201130000618/http://astrobio.net/news-exclusive/how-habitable-is-mars-a-new-view-of-the-viking-experiments/ How Habitable Is Mars? A New View of the Viking Experiments] By Elizabeth Howell -Astrobiology Magazine (NASA) Nov 21, 2013</ref>
 
In short, the findings are intriguing but there is no consensus yet on whether the correct interpretation is biological or chemical. Most scientists still favour the chemical explanation, though a few scientists have recently shown renewed interest in a possible biological explanation.
Line 697:
Other authors also cite:
 
* '''''Lack of nitrogen'''''. All life on Earth requires nitrogen. Also there are theoretical reasons for expecting alien organic life to use nitrogen, as the weaker nitrogen based amide bonds are essential for the processes by which DNA is replicated. Mars, compared with Earth, has little nitrogen, either in the air or in the soil. Levels of nitrogen in the air are low, possibly too low for nitrogen fixation to be possible. But they can form in Martian conditions by non biological processes - either brought to Mars by meteorites (some carbonaceous chondrites are rich in nitrogen<ref>{{cite web|title=Meteorite with abundant nitrogen for life on Earth?|url=httphttps://www.nhmbbc.acco.uk/about-us/news/2011/march/meteoritescience-withenvironment-abundant-nitrogen-for-life-on-earth95139.html12597564|website=Natural History Museum, LondonBBC|date=March 41, 2011}}</ref>), or comets, or formed by lightning, or through atmospheric processes, or there may be ancient nitrate deposits from early Mars, amongst various possible sources.<ref>"Nitrogen is continuously dry-deposited from the atmosphere of Mars even today mainly as pernitric acid. During the Amazonian, 4.3 × 1018 g NO4 could have been deposited across the martian surface if all of the nitrate is formed through atmospheric photochemistry and persists without decomposition or any further reactions. This corresponds to a concentration of 0.3 wt.% N if it is mixed uniformly to a depth of 2 m. This prediction can be confirmed or disproved by future in situ measurements."</ref>
 
Life on Mars may be limited to locations with local abundance of nitrates. Or, it may also be able to take advantage of fixation of nitrogen in monolayers of water, a process that can happen in present-day Mars conditions, and may be able to produce enough nitrates to supply a subsurface biosphere.<ref name="BoxeHand2012">{{cite journal|url=httphttps://yly-macauthors.gpslibrary.caltech.edu/Reprintsyly30213/A_RecentPapers1/Boxe%20et%20al%202012Boxe2012p17592Int_J_Astrobiol.pdf|last1=Boxe|first1=C.S.|last2=Hand|first2=K.P.|last3=Nealson|first3=K.H.|last4=Yung|first4=Y.L.|last5=Saiz-Lopez|first5=A.|title=An active nitrogen cycle on Mars sufficient to support a subsurface biosphere|journal=International Journal of Astrobiology|volume=11|issue=2|year=2012|pages=109–115|issn=1473-5504|doi=10.1017/S1473550411000401|bibcode=2012IJAsB..11..109B}}</ref>
 
Schuerger also mentions:
Line 812:
Gary M. King, PNAS March 23, 2015, {{DOI|10.1073/pnas.1424989112}}</ref> || O<sub>2</sub>: partial pressure too low
|-
| organics: meteoritic likely to be present at surface || NO{{su|b=3|p=−}}: presence or abundance unknown
|-
| organics: endogenous available in subsurface || ClO{{su|b=4|p=−}}: available but not shown to support life
|-
| - || CO<sub>2</sub>: in the atmosphere
|}
 
A candidate metabolism would use one of the electron donors in the first column paired with one of the electron acceptors on the right as a source of energy. (The finalpaper dashalso onmentions leftCO<sub>2</sub> hand sidewhich is thereused justas becausean theelectron listacceptor ofby electronmethanogens donorswith ismolecular shorterhydrogen thanas the listdonor. of electron acceptors).
 
See also the presentations in: [http://planets.ucla.edu/meetings/past-meetings/mars-habitability-2013/program/ Redox Potentials for Martian Life]