Mars Sample Receiving Facility and sample containment: Difference between revisions

Line 188:
</ref>
 
As a result, they recommended a minimum size of 0.01&nbsp;µm on the basis that this is nearly half the size of the smallest GTAs known and less than a tenth of the size of the smallest currently known free-living self-replicating microorganisms. They recommend that the probability of release of a particle this large should be less than 1 in a million.
 
In the case where 0.01&nbsp;µm can't be achieved at a reasonable cost, and in view of the almost negligible risks from GTAs, they give 0.05&nbsp;µm as a maximum permitted minimum size. ThisA sizeparticle wasof chosenthis assize lessshould thannot halfbe thatreleased ofunder theany smallestcircumstances currently(not knownjust micro-organismsa -1 so unlikely to containin a free-livingmillion microorganism.chance, Theyit recommendshouldn't thathappen suchat an increase of the minimum size requirement requires independent review by a panel of expertsall).<ref>Quotes from the ESF report to assist editors in verifying the paraphrase
 
This size was chosen as less than half that of the smallest currently known micro-organisms - so unlikely to contain a free-living microorganism. They recommend that such an increase of the minimum size requirement requires independent review by a panel of experts.<ref>Quotes from the ESF report to assist editors in verifying the paraphrase
{{bq|Unsterilised particles smaller than 0.01 µm would be unlikely to contain any organisms, whether free-living self-replicating (the smallest free-living self-replicating microorganisms observed are in the range of 0.12–0,2 µm, i.e. more than one order of magnitude larger), GTA-type (the smallest GTA observed is 0,03 µm, i.e. three times larger) or virus-type (the smallest GTA observed is 0,017 µm, i.e. almost twice as large). This level should be considered as the bottom line basic requirement when designing the mission systems and operation.}}