User:Robertinventor/Simple animals could live in Martian brines - Extended Interview with planetary scientist Vlada Stamenković: Difference between revisions
User:Robertinventor/Simple animals could live in Martian brines - Extended Interview with planetary scientist Vlada Stamenković (edit)
Revision as of 21:01, 6 September 2020
, 3 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
__NOINDEX__
Now published as [[Sponges on Mars? We ask Stamenković about their oxygen-rich briny seeps model]]
Please don't share. For publishing to my own wiki and blog. This article is mid edit. If you spot any errors be sure to say! [[User:Robertinventor|Robertinventor]] ([[User talk:Robertinventor|talk]]) 13:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Line 258 ⟶ 260:
==Background information -
A historical 101 on multicellular life on Mars may be of interest here. First, of course back in the early twentieth century there was much speculation about oxygen breathing multicellular life there, with Lowell even speculating that intelligent Martians built the canals that he thought he could see in his telescope
By the time of the first orbital robotic space missions to Mars, it was already clear that the atmosphere was far too thin for terrestrial animals, but there was some hope for plant life. However, the early observations from space showed a barren crater covered land and since then the idea of life on Mars has focused mainly on anaerobic microbes and photosynthetic life.
<!-- For next para: Vera et al in the background information is an example of papers on lichens such as Pleopsidium chlorophanum for Mars and the DLR source gives an overview of their experiments into lichens and blue-green algae-->
In 2014, however, researchers for DLR, Vera et al surprised many astrobiologists with their experimental result that
==Background information - why oxygen is so significant for multicellular life==
<!--Note to reviewer - optional section on background information which I thought might help some readers.-->
<!-- summarizes Catling et al from 2014 in background section -->
[[File:Spinoloricus.png|thumb|This tiny animal, which never grows larger than a millimeter in size, is a species of {{w|Loricifera#In_anoxic_environment|loricifera}}, a rare multicellular anaerobe. Shown this colour because it is stained with Rose Bengal. Scale bar is 50 μm. In 2014, Carling et al. showed from general energetic considerations that should also apply to extraterrestrial carbon based life, that it is not easy for a food chain of anaerobes to sustain complex lifeforms even as large as 10 cms in diameter {{Image source|Danovaro et al.}}]]
It is possible for microbes to slowly build large structures without breathing oxygen, as with the {{w|Stromatolite|stromatolites}}, which build up layer by layer. However, only the outermost layer, a thin biofilm, is actually alive. Lichens of course do use oxygen, produced by the algal component. Trees and other plants produce oxygen but also use it at night.
What about extraterrestrial life though? Could it use something else in place of oxygen? Well, perhaps, but there is some earlier research that may suggest that it couldn't get very large. In 2005, Catling et al investigated the amount of energy available to carbon based organisms if with and without the use of oxygen in their metabolism. Oxygen produces the largest amount of free energy per electron transfer apart from fluorine and bromine, which are too reactive to build up in quantities useful to life. They found on general energetic principles that it still needs oxygen to sustain large complex lifeforms, from around 10 cms in size or larger. This is for any extraterrestrial food web for carbon based life.▼
▲What about extraterrestrial life though? Could it use something else in place of oxygen? Well, perhaps, but there is some earlier research that may suggest that it couldn't get very large. In 2005, Catling et al investigated the amount of energy available to carbon based organisms
They worked it out by looking at how many smaller organisms are needed to support larger ones in the food web. For aerobic life the number of organisms in a food web is inversely proportional to the mass, if you are ten times heavier then there are ten times fewer of you in the food web. These numbers are much less for {{w|Anaerobic organism|anaerobes}}.
According to Catling et al's modeling, if an organism is a hundred times larger (and so a million times more massive)
Meanwhile an organism that's a hundred times larger in an anaerobic food web is a billion times less numerous in an anaerobic food web.
So for instance, if you have a 200 micron organism preying on 20 micron organisms and they in turn on 2 micron organisms then for a billion of the 2 micron organisms there will be a thousand of the 200 micron organisms in an aerobic food chain, but only one in an anaerobic food chain. By the time you get to large organisms of 10 cm scale or larger they should be almost non existent in an anaerobic food web.
Whether or not this applies generally to all extra terrestrial life, it does seem to apply to Earth life. In anoxic environments, Earth animals have found it a challenge to get as large as 1 mm in size without oxygen. It is possible that larger creatures lived on Earth when the seas were all anoxic before the Great Oxygenation Event. There are no surviving multicellular lifeforms from those times but they would be likely to be soft tissued and hard to preserve.
▲So, if Catling et al are correct in their inference here, then on general energetic principles that an extraterrestrial biosphere with large carbon based animals, at least of 10 cms scale or larger, is going to need oxygen. It seems to apply to Earth anyway. In anoxic environments, Earth animals have found it a challenge to get as large as 1 mm in size without oxygen, though it is possible that larger creatures lived on Earth when the seas were all anoxic.
==Technical details - guide to paper==
|