User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal3: Difference between revisions
→Unblock request
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
==Unblock request==
<nowiki></nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Firstly, apologies for taking up so much of everyone’s time in the past. With guidance from friends, I have been able to learn valuable lessons on Wiki editing
The main issues arose when
Line 11:
As per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_was_the_page_I_created_deleted%3F#If_all_else_fails,_try_another_wiki WP:OTHERWIKIS] we have made new wikis to host the deleted content[https://encyclopediaofbuddhism.org][https://encyclopediaofastrobiology.org].
I will
* do most substantial editing in my own wikis.
* Seek co-editors also keen on the project, with diverse views. .
* They will help with encyclopedic tone, notability, reliable sources and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:NPOV].
This will ensure
I am also committed to reducing my word count.
*
* '''''Commercial use''''' - Wikipedia's license[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_LicenseCreative] permits this. Only a couple of sentences in my 2015 booklet were by other editors anyway[https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Water+on+Mars&oldid=556727781&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Frobertinventor.com%2Fbooklets%2Fpresentdaymarshabitats.html]. ▼
* ''''Non free content''''' - Wikipedia's license permits dual licensing[https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-enter-into-separate-or-supplemental-agreements-with-users-of-my-work]<ref>''"It is legally possible to add more restrictions than the original license in some cases, for example, releasing a derivative work under all rights reserved which incorporates source materials licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license."'' [http://wikieducator.org/Creative_Commons_unplugged/Remix_and_compatibility#Compatibility_among_different_CC_licenses Compatibility among different CC licenses]</ref>: CC by SA here, all rights reserved in my 2017 book[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/If_humans_touch_Mars.htm].▼
▲* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO. My Tune Smithy article in 2008 was cited to Sound on Sound similarly to other material in the topic area[https://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22sound+on+sound%22]. When I discovered [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest WP:COI] guidelines in 2011, I added a COI statement[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Declaration_of_interest].
*
▲* Commercial use - Wikipedia's license[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_LicenseCreative] permits this. Only a couple of sentences in my 2015 booklet were by other editors anyway[https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Water+on+Mars&oldid=556727781&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Frobertinventor.com%2Fbooklets%2Fpresentdaymarshabitats.html].
▲* Non free content - Wikipedia's license permits dual licensing[https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-enter-into-separate-or-supplemental-agreements-with-users-of-my-work]<ref>''"It is legally possible to add more restrictions than the original license in some cases, for example, releasing a derivative work under all rights reserved which incorporates source materials licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license."'' [http://wikieducator.org/Creative_Commons_unplugged/Remix_and_compatibility#Compatibility_among_different_CC_licenses Compatibility among different CC licenses]</ref>: CC by SA here, all rights reserved in my 2017 book[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/If_humans_touch_Mars.htm].
▲* None of the material was my own [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:POV] or intentionally [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research WP:OR]. The title of the deleted article came from an astrobiology conference sub session<ref name=modernmarshabitability>[https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/abscicon2017/program-abstracts/topics/index.shtml#solarSystem Session Topics] - ArbSciCon 2017:
*Theme: Solar System Sites
*Session: Mars
Line 36 ⟶ 32:
*Summary:
{{quote|Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars.}}
</ref>. I sourced the mainstream view to NASA, such as NASA'S MEPAG Goals for Mars Exploration<ref> Hamilton, V.E., Rafkin, S., Withers, P., Ruff, S., Yingst, R.A., Whitley, R., Center, J.S., Beaty, D.W., Diniega, S., Hays, L. and Zurek, R., [https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/reports/MEPAG%20Goals_Document_2015_v18_FINAL.pdf Mars Science Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities: 2015 Version]
</ref>. The views I tried to express mostly came from NASA, as in this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video], third on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I accept the community decision.▼
:"Goal I: determine if Mars ever supported life
:* Objective A: [about past life]
▲
* '''''I did contribute a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE] science article in medicine in 2015[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802]'''''. However it states that it is fringe science as the first sentence, links to the main article on the topic, which didn't link back, and such articles do not follow [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine) MEDRS]. My model was[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease]. I never edited the main article[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Morgellons], wasn't sanctioned, left the topic in 2016[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/1/Morgellons] and never returned.
* '''''Made a minor mistake in Perigean tides'''''. However [WP:BOLD] says "". The other minor edit criticized is identical to the paragraph in Black Holes added in [][] which is a Good article since 2010[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&oldid=382081986]. Some of the 1,859 watchers[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Black_hole] would have checked the cites were reliable and summarized accurately. It is true that when I copied it to Hawking Radiation I did not notice that one of the sentences didn't match the title of the section.
I only occasinally added substantial
My main work was wikignoming, error fixing, and this is what I want to return to do. For instance the Chicxulub article says the impactor diameter ranges from 11 to 81 km. The usual range is 10 - 15 km. Their cite is to a preprint in arxiv.org which only gets moderation to categorize
When I have time I may also return to my work on patrolling proposals for deletion[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Patroling_proposals_for_deletion], and my work on microtonal music including the Microtonal Music project proposal "to do" list[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales#Examples_of_things_we_could_do]
|