User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal3: Difference between revisions

The closing admin didn't pick out any particular points[[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]]. I will answer a few, pleasePlease let me know if I need to answer more.

* I have never'''''Never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO'''''. My Tune Smithy, articleadded in 2008 was cited to Sound on Sound similarlyoften toused otheras materiala incite thefor topicthis areatopic[https://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22sound+on+sound%22]. When I discovered [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest WP:COI] guidelines in 2011, I added a COI statement[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Declaration_of_interest].

* '''''Commercial use''''' - Wikipedia's license[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_LicenseCreative] permits this. Only a couple of sentences in my 2015 booklet were by other editors anyway[https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Water+on+Mars&oldid=556727781&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Frobertinventor.com%2Fbooklets%2Fpresentdaymarshabitats.html].

* ''''Non free content''''' - Wikipedia's license permits dual licensing[https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-enter-into-separate-or-supplemental-agreements-with-users-of-my-work]<ref>''"It is legally possible to add more restrictions than the original license in some cases, for example, releasing a derivative work under all rights reserved which incorporates source materials licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license."'' [http://wikieducator.org/Creative_Commons_unplugged/Remix_and_compatibility#Compatibility_among_different_CC_licenses Compatibility among different CC licenses]</ref>: CC by SA here, all rights reserved in my 2017 book[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/If_humans_touch_Mars.htm].

* None'''''Never of the material wascontributed my own [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:POV] or intentionallyintentional [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research WP:OR]'''''. The title of the deleted article came from an astrobiology conference sub session<ref name=modernmarshabitability>[https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/abscicon2017/program-abstracts/topics/index.shtml#solarSystem Session Topics] - ArbSciCon 2017:

</ref>. The views I triedsourced tothe expressmainstream mostlyview came fromto NASA, as in this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video], third on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. It had cites for these views that I assessed to be of highest level of notability and reliability such as NASA'S MEPAG Goals for Mars Exploration<ref> Hamilton, V.E., Rafkin, S., Withers, P., Ruff, S., Yingst, R.A., Whitley, R., Center, J.S., Beaty, D.W., Diniega, S., Hays, L. and Zurek, R., [https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/reports/MEPAG%20Goals_Document_2015_v18_FINAL.pdf Mars Science Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities: 2015 Version].

:* Objective B: determine if environments with high potential for current habitability and expression of biosignatures contain evidence of extant life."</ref>, and as expressed in this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video], third on the main overview page for NASA's Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview].. The dinner plate analogy is a quote from the speaker in that video. I accept the community decision to delete itmy article.

* '''''I did contribute ana article[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories onWP:FRINGE] fringescience medicinearticle in 201medicine in 2015[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802]'''''. However it followed all the guidelines for such articles. It saidstates that the topicit is WP:FRINGEfringe inscience as the first sentence, linkedlinks to the main article on the topic, and Iwhich didn't editlink theback, mainand articlesuch toarticles linkdo backnot follow [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine) MEDRS]. My model was[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease]. I never edited the main article[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Morgellons], wasn't sanctioned, left the topic in 2016[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/1/Morgellons] and never returned.

* I did make'''''Made a minor mistake in Perigean tides'''''. However [WP:BOLD] says "". The other minor edit criticized is identical to the paragraph in Black Holes added in [][] which is a Good article since 2010[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&oldid=382081986]. Some of the 18591,859 watchers[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Black_hole] would have checked the cites were reliable and summarized accurately. It is true that when I copied it to Hawking Radiation I did not notice that one of the sentences didn't match the title of the section.