User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal3: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal3 (edit)

Revision as of 15:53, 30 April 2019

444 bytes removed , 5 years ago

→‎Unblock request

VisualWikitext

Robertinventor

Bureaucrats, Administrators

2,398

edits

Revision as of 15:45, 30 April 2019 (edit) Robertinventor (talk \| contribs) (→‎Unblock request) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 15:53, 30 April 2019 (edit) (undo) Robertinventor (talk \| contribs) (→‎Unblock request)
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 37: :* Objective A: [about past life] :* Objective B: determine if environments with high potential for current habitability and expression of biosignatures contain evidence of extant life."</ref>, and as expressed in this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video], third on the main overview page for NASA's Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview].. The dinner plate analogy is a quote from the speaker in that video. I accept the community decision to delete my article. * '''''I did contribute ana [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories ~~article~~WP:FRINGE] onscience ~~fringe~~article in medicine in 2015[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802 ~~article~~]'''''. However it ~~followed all the guidelines for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE],~~ states that it is fringe science as the first sentence, ~~linked~~links to the main article on the topic, which didn't link back, and such articles do not follow [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine) MEDRS]~~, see~~. ~~for~~My ~~example~~model was[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease]. I never edited the main article[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Morgellons] ~~though I did discuss it on its talk page~~, wasn't sanctioned, left the topic in 2016[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/1/Morgellons] and never returned.▼ * ~~I did make~~'''''Made a minor mistake in Perigean tides'''''. However [WP:BOLD] says "". The other minor edit criticized is identical to the paragraph in Black Holes added in [][] which is a Good article since 2010[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&oldid=382081986]. Some of the ~~1859~~1,859 watchers[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Black_hole] would have checked the cites were reliable and summarized accurately. It is true that when I copied it to Hawking Radiation I did not notice that one of the sentences didn't match the title of the section. ▼ states that it is fringe science as its first sentence, clearly explains that the research has limited support, and followed all the guidelines for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE]. Fringe articles on medicine are not required to follow MEDRS, see for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease] ▲* I did contribute an article on fringe medicine in 2015[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802 article]. However it followed all the guidelines for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE], states that it is fringe science as the first sentence, linked to the main article on the topic, which didn't link back, and such articles do not follow [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine) MEDRS], see for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease]. I never edited the main article[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Morgellons] though I did discuss it on its talk page, wasn't sanctioned, left the topic in 2016[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/1/Morgellons] and never returned. ▲* I did make a minor mistake in Perigean tides. However [WP:BOLD] says "". The other minor edit criticized is identical to the paragraph in Black Holes added in [][] which is a Good article since 2010[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&oldid=382081986]. Some of the 1859 watchers[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Black_hole] would have checked the cites were reliable and summarized accurately. It is true that when I copied it to Hawking Radiation I did not notice that one of the sentences didn't match the title of the section. I only occasinally added substantial content to Wikipedia, and our other wikis take up a lot of my time now.