User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal3: Difference between revisions
→Unblock request
Line 36:
*Summary:
{{quote|Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars.}}
</ref>. The views I tried to express mostly came from NASA, as in this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video], third on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. It had
:"Goal I: determine if Mars ever supported life
:* Objective A: [about past life]
:* Objective B: determine if environments with high potential for current habitability and expression of biosignatures contain evidence of extant life."</ref>. I accept the community decision to delete it.
* I did contribute an article on fringe medicine in 201 . However it followed all the guidelines for such articles. It said that the topic is WP:FRINGE in the first sentence, linked to the main article on the topic, and I didn't edit the main article to link back. I wasn't sanctioned, left the topic in 2016 and never returned.
* I did make a minor mistake in Perigean tides. However [WP:BOLD] says "". The other minor edit criticized is identical to the paragraph in Black Holes added in [][] which is a Good article since 2010[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&oldid=382081986]. Some of the 1859 watchers[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Black_hole] would have checked the cites were reliable and summarized accurately. It is true that when I copied it to Hawking Radiation I did not notice that one of the sentences didn't match the title of the section.
| |||