User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal4: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5:
The main issues arose when
 
* I spent a long time authoringauthored substantial new content by myself (Or Dorje108 did, for Buddhism)
* another editor (not a collaborator) suddenly deleted it, or nominated it, usually without prior discussion.
* and I posted to talk pages to try to get it restored or kept. Note, I never edit war. Just talk.
 
I am aware I tend to become more verbose when this happens, it’s my academic background kicking in!
 
My plan is to do minor edits and corrections for six months. After that, to do any major content with collaborators from the start. This would deal with issues of competence, because we would be working together. I already do this on Wikinews[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Mysterious_dimming_of_Tabby%27s_star_likely_due_to_space_dust,_not_alien_superstructures,_say_scientists][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87#Review_of_revision_4457552_%5BPassed%5D][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Sun%27s_mood_swings_not_so_strange_after_all,_say_scientists]. After completing it together we'd submit it for review as a Good Article again similarly to WikiNews.
 
I have already worked on an article with another editor here in this way[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Meade_(author)]. This was eventually passed as a Good article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Meade_(author)&diff=prev&oldid=830640681] which retains all the cites I added.