User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal4: Difference between revisions

From Astrobiology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
Content added Content deleted
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:
I ask to be unblocked to return to error fixing[https://doomsdaydebunked.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia_mistakes_or_omissions] which I did most weeks as volunteer editor for Wikipedia.
I ask to be unblocked to return to error fixing[https://doomsdaydebunked.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia_mistakes_or_omissions] which I did most weeks as volunteer editor for Wikipedia.


I may eventually return to content creation, perhaps microtonal[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales_project_proposal]. If so, my plan is to seek collaborators from the start, for encyclopedic tone, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc, then seek Good article review as for the David Meade article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Meade_(author)&diff=prev&oldid=830640681]. However for now that's for Wikinews where I collaborate with other editors for substantive content[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87].
After six months of wikignoming I may return to content creation, perhaps microtonal[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales_project_proposal]. If so, my plan is to seek collaborators from the start, for encyclopedic tone, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc, then seek Good article review as for the David Meade article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Meade_(author)&diff=prev&oldid=830640681]. However for now that's for Wikinews where I collaborate with other editors for substantive content[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87].


Thank you for your time in considering this appeal.
Thank you for your time in considering this appeal.

Revision as of 08:30, 29 May 2019

Unblock request

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Robertinventor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly, apologies for taking up so much of everyone’s time in the past. With guidance from friends, I have been able to learn valuable lessons on Wiki editing. I would now like to re-engage, mainly as a wikignome, with no hard feelings on my side.

The main issues arose when

  • I spent a long time authoring substantial new content (Or Dorje108 did, for Buddhism)
  • another editor suddenly deleted it, or nominated it, usually without prior discussion
  • and I posted to talk pages to try to get it restored or kept. Note, I never edit war. Just talk.

I am aware I tend to become more verbose when this happens, it’s my academic background kicking in!

As per WP:OTHERWIKIS the deleted content is now in other wikis or blogs (e.g. [1][2][3][4][5]). I accept the consensus decision to delete it here.

I have a ten year history of Wikignoming with no issues.

I am also committed to reducing my word count.

The closing admin didn't pick out any particular points[6]. In the discussion, only a couple of points relate to wikignoming:

  • Made a minor mistake in Perigean tides.[7]. However WP:BOLD says "Think about it this way: if you don't find one of your edits being reverted now and then, perhaps you're not being bold enough".

The other minor edit discussed originated in Black hole [8](1,859 watchers[9] and a Good article[10]) where it was immediately reviewed by WolfmanSF[11]. It is still there[12] as are the other two I mentioned [13][14][15][16].

Affirmations of good faith:

  • Never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO, sourced 2008 article[17] to "Sound on Sound", often used for notability[18][19][20][21] and added COI statement[22] once I found guidelines[23].
  • Commercial use of Wikipedia content permitted under its license[24], only a few sentences from deleted section[25], credited and correctly licensed[26].
  • Added content under dual licensing[27][1]: CC by SA here, all rights reserved in my 2017 book[28], originated as Wikipedia draft.
  • Deleted article was not personal views. Aimed to add material sourced[29] mainly to NASA[2][3] and astrobiologists[4] who I consider pre-eminent WP:RS on Mars astrobiology. I accept consensus to delete it. Just to clarify intent.
  • Wikipedia has articles on fringe medicine[30] and the article I added in 2015[31] followed guidelines for WP:FRINGE.

Note, I was the main editor of Planetary protection (69.3% mine, check with WhoColor[32]). However, if unblocked, I will not return because of connection with deleted material[33][34] but edit my copy[35].

I ask to be unblocked to return to error fixing[36] which I did most weeks as volunteer editor for Wikipedia.

After six months of wikignoming I may return to content creation, perhaps microtonal[37]. If so, my plan is to seek collaborators from the start, for encyclopedic tone, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc, then seek Good article review as for the David Meade article[38]. However for now that's for Wikinews where I collaborate with other editors for substantive content[39][40].

Thank you for your time in considering this appeal.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
  1. ↑ "It is legally possible to add more restrictions than the original license in some cases, for example, releasing a derivative work under all rights reserved which incorporates source materials licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license." Compatibility among different CC licenses
  2. ↑ Hamilton, V.E., Rafkin, S., Withers, P., Ruff, S., Yingst, R.A., Whitley, R., Center, J.S., Beaty, D.W., Diniega, S., Hays, L. and Zurek, R., Mars Science Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities: 2015 Version.

    "Goal I: determine if Mars ever supported life

    • Objective A: ...[past life].
    • Objective B: determine if environments with high potential for current habitability and expression of biosignatures contain evidence of extant life."

    Please note - I give this and the other cites solely to show that I was presenting views expressed by others and not myself. I am not trying to use these cites to try to say that Wikipedia has to present these views in Life on Mars, or indeed anywhere else, and I accept the community decision to delete this material.

  3. ↑ Chang, Kenneth (October 5, 2015). "Mars Is Pretty Clean. Her Job at NASA Is to Keep It That Way". New York Times.  Interview with Catherine Conley, NASA's Planetary protection officer[41] at the time

    "The salts known as perchlorates that lower the freezing temperature of water at the R.S.L.s, keeping it liquid, can be consumed by some Earth microbes. “The environment on Mars potentially is basically one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms,” Dr. Conley said."

    .
  4. ↑ Session Topics - ArbSciCon 2017:
    • Theme: Solar System Sites
    • Session: Mars
    • Subsession: Habitability
    • Topic: Modern Mars Habitability
    • Summary:

    "Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars."

Retrieved from "https://encyclopediaofastrobiology.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor/Unblock_appeal4?oldid=10742"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information