User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3:
<nowiki></nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Firstly, apologies for taking up so much of everyone’s time in the past. With guidance from friends, I have been able to learn valuable lessons on Wiki editing. I would now like to re-engage, mainly as a wikignome, with no hard feelings on my side.
 
As per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_was_the_page_I_created_deleted%3F#If_all_else_fails,_try_another_wiki WP:OTHERWIKIS] the deleted content is now in other wikis or blogs[https://encyclopediaofbuddhism.org][https://encyclopediaofastrobiology.org][http://robertinventor.com/ftswiki/Tune_Smithy][https://doomsdaydebunked.miraheze.org/wiki/Clathrate_gun_hypothesis][https://www.science20.com/robert_inventor/mystery_of_morgellons_disease_or_delusion_scientific_hypothesis_of_connection_with_lyme_disease-155742]) and that is where I plan to continue to work on it.
 
I accept the consensus decision to delete this material from Wikipedia. I am also committed to reducing my word count.
Line 11:
* '''''Made a minor mistake in Perigean tides'''''.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Perigean_spring_tide#Confusing_first_paragraph]. However [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold WP:BOLD] says ''"Think about it this way: if you don't find one of your edits being reverted now and then, perhaps you're not being bold enough"''.
 
The other minor edit discussed in the debate originated in Black hole [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&diff=prev&oldid=852417737](1,859 watchers[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Black_hole] and a Good article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&oldid=382081986]) where it was immediately reviewed by WolfmanSF[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&type=revision&diff=852426575&oldid=852418871]. It is still there[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_ref-Frautschi1982_139-0] as are the other two minor edits I mentioned [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stellar_population&type=revision&diff=844844779&oldid=844322513][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Megatsunami&type=revision&diff=848088930&oldid=843120593][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megatsunami#cite_ref-MegatsunamiStudyFlawed_23-0][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_population#cite_ref-21] and many others I have contributed over the years.
 
I ask to be unblocked to return to error fixing[https://doomsdaydebunked.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia_mistakes_or_omissions] which I did most weeks as volunteer editor for Wikipedia. Here are some that I have noticed since I was indef blocked: [https://doomsdaydebunked.miraheze.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia_mistakes_or_omissions].
 
I may eventually return to content creation, perhaps microtonal[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales_project_proposal]. If so, my plan is to seek collaborators from the start, for encyclopedic tone, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc. However for now that's for other wikis andincluding my own. Also for Wikinews, where I collaborate with other editors forwith substantiveoccasional contentarticles[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars] and contributed one major article, an original reporting "scoop"[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87#Review_of_revision_4457552_%5BPassed%5D]I. What I learn there is likely to help if I do return to content creation here.
 
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion, so I would like to respond to themsome of the main points for clarity, but it is collapsed as you may not need to assesassess them.
 
{{cot|Other points}}
Line 33:
* Objective A: ...[past life].
* Objective B: determine if environments with high potential for current habitability and expression of biosignatures contain evidence of extant life."''}}
'''''Please note''''' - I give this and the other cites solely to show that I was presenting views expressed by others and not myself. I am not trying to use these cites to try to say that Wikipedia has to present these views in Life on Mars, or indeed anywhere else, and. I accept that the consensus community decision has been made to delete this material, 14:1, with me as the only one voting against it.
{{quote|''"The salts known as perchlorates that lower the freezing temperature of water at the R.S.L.s, keeping it liquid, can be consumed by some Earth microbes. “The environment on Mars potentially is basically one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms,” Dr. Conley said."''}}.</ref>, who I personally evaluate as the pre-eminent [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources WP:RS] on Mars astrobiology. .I accept consensus to delete it. Just to clarify intent.
</ref><ref name=Conley>{{cite news|last1=Chang|first1=Kenneth|title=Mars Is Pretty Clean. Her Job at NASA Is to Keep It That Way.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/science/mars-catharine-conley-nasa-planetary-protection-officer.html|agency=New York Times|date=October 5, 2015}}
* '''''The article on fringe medicine[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802] followed the guidelines''''' infrom [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE for] like the other suchfringe medicine articles[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease]
Interview with Catherine Conley, NASA's Planetary protection officer[https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/people/1421/catharine-cassie-conley/] at the time
{{quote|''"The salts known as perchlorates that lower the freezing temperature of water at the R.S.L.s, keeping it liquid, can be consumed by some Earth microbes. “The environment on Mars potentially is basically one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms,” Dr. Conley said."''}}.</ref>, who I personally evaluate as the pre-eminent [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources WP:RS] on Mars astrobiology. .I accept consensus to delete it. Just to clarify intent.
* '''''The article on fringe medicine followed the guidelines''''' in WP:FRINGE for like other such articles[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease]
* '''''Wikipedia's content license permits dual licensing[https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-enter-into-separate-or-supplemental-agreements-with-users-of-my-work]<ref>''"It is legally possible to add more restrictions than the original license in some cases, for example, releasing a derivative work under all rights reserved which incorporates source materials licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license."'' [http://wikieducator.org/Creative_Commons_unplugged/Remix_and_compatibility#Compatibility_among_different_CC_licenses Compatibility among different CC licenses]</ref>''''', the same material in Wikipedia under CC by SA and in my online book[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/If_humans_touch_Mars.htm] under "all rights reserved"