User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion, so for clarity:
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion, so for clarity:


* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO. I used a cite often used for notability in the topic area.
* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO.
* I do use a few sentences from Wikipedia in a kindle booklet but this is permitted under CC by SA
* I included a few sentences from a deleted section in a kindle booklet under CC by SA
* The deleted article summarized the cites in good faith and did not present my views.
* I did not add my own views to Wikipedia, but summarized the cites in good faith.
* I did add an article on fringe medicine, but followed the guidelines in WP:FRINGE for such articles
* The article on fringe medicine followed the guidelines in WP:FRINGE for such articles
* I did not copy blog posts into Wikipedia, instead I copied deleted material and drafts into my blog
* I copied deleted material and drafts into my blog rather than the other way round.
* I did use material that I added to Wikipedia in my 2017 kindle and online book under "all rights reserved" however you may not be aware that Wikipedia's content license permits dual licensing
* I used the same material in Wikipedia under CC by SA and in my online book under "all rights reserved" however Wikipedia's content license permits this form of dual licensing


If you feel I need to answer these or any other points in more detail, can I ask you to please wait for my response first before making any decisions, thanks.
If you feel I need to answer these or any other points in more detail, can I ask you to please wait for my response first before making any decisions, thanks.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.