User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29:
I may eventually return to content creation, perhaps microtonal[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales_project_proposal]. If so, my plan is to seek collaborators from the start, for encyclopedic tone, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc. However for now that's for other wikis and Wikinews where I collaborate with other editors for substantive content[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87].
* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO.
* I used a couple of sentences of a deleted article in a booklet I sold on kindle, but that is permitted as I attributed it correctly.
* I did not add my own views to Wikipedia, but summarized the cites to the best of my ability.
* I did add material on fringe medicine, but I followed the guidelines in WP:FRINGE for such articles.
* I did not copy blog posts into Wikipedia, instead I copied deleted material and drafts into my blog, telling the reader that they were deleted.
* I did use material that I added to Wikipedia in my book under "all rights reserved" however you may not be aware that Wikipedia's content license permits dual licensing, including releasing material here under CC by SA and under "no rights reserved" in my book.
If you feel I need to answer these in more detail, or any of the other points, can I ask you to ask me for my response first before making any decisions based on them, thanks.
| |||