User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 31:
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion and I think I need to clarify a few points.
 
* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO. For my 2008 article about my software, I used a source that is often used to establish notability in the topic area. I added a COI statement as soon as I became aware of the rules.
* I useddo use a couple offew sentences of a deleted articlesection of Water on Mars in a 2015 booklet I soldsell on kindle, but that is permitted asunder CC by SA since I attributed it correctly.
* I did not add my own views to Wikipedia, but summarized the cites toin thegood bestfaith. of my ability, and theThe main cites for my article were review level and onessources that I consideredconsider to be of the highest reliability in my topic area.
* I did add an article on fringe medicine in 2015, but I followed the guidelines in WP:FRINGE for such articles as well as the model of another fringe medicine article here in Wikipedia.
* I did not copy blog posts into Wikipedia, instead I copied deleted material and drafts into my blog, telling the reader that they were deleted.
* I did use material that I added to Wikipedia in my 2017 kindle and online book under "all rights reserved" however you may not be aware that Wikipedia's content license permits dual licensing, including releasing material here under CC by SA and under "no rights reserved" in my book.
 
If you feel I need to answer these in more detail, or any of the other points, can I ask you to ask me for my response first before making any decisions based on them, thanks.