User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 29:
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion, so for clarity:
 
* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO. I used a cite often used for notability in the topic area.
* I do useincluded a few sentences from Wikipediaa deleted section in a kindle booklet but this is permitted under CC by SA
* The deleted article summarized the cites in good faith and did not present my views.
* I did not add my own views to Wikipedia, but summarized the cites in good faith.
* I did add anThe article on fringe medicine, but followed the guidelines in WP:FRINGE for such articles
* I did not copy blog posts into Wikipedia, instead I copied deleted material and drafts into my blog rather than the other way round.
* I didused usethe same material thatin IWikipedia addedunder toCC Wikipediaby SA and in my 2017 kindle and online book under "all rights reserved" however you may not be aware that Wikipedia's content license permits this form of dual licensing
 
If you feel I need to answer these or any other points in more detail, can I ask you to please wait for my response first before making any decisions, thanks.