User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23:
* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO. The main cite for Tune Smithy, Sound on Sound, is often used for notability in this topic area.
* I included a few sentences from a deleted section in a kindle booklet under CC by SA
* The deleted article on Modern Mars Habitability summarized the cites in good faith and did not present my views. Its title came from an astrobiology sub-session title<ref name=modernmarshabitability>[https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/abscicon2017/program-abstracts/topics/index.shtml#solarSystem Session Topics] - ArbSciCon 2017:
*Theme: Solar System Sites
*Session: Mars
*Subsession: Habitability
*Topic: Modern Mars Habitability
*Summary:
{{quote|''"Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars."''}}</ref> .
* The article on fringe medicine followed the guidelines in WP:FRINGE for such articles
* I copied deleted material and drafts into my blog rather than the other way round.
| |||