User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21:
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion, so for clarity:
* '''''I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO'''''. The main cite for Tune Smithy, Sound on Sound, is often used for notability in this topic area.
* '''''I included a few sentences from a deleted section''''' in a kindle booklet under CC by SA
* '''''The deleted article on Modern Mars Habitability summarized the cites in good faith''''' and did not present my views. Its title came from an astrobiology sub-session title<ref name=modernmarshabitability>[https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/abscicon2017/program-abstracts/topics/index.shtml#solarSystem Session Topics] - ArbSciCon 2017:
*Theme: Solar System Sites
*Session: Mars
Line 30:
*Summary:
{{quote|''"Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars."''}}</ref> .
* '''''The article on fringe medicine followed the guidelines''''' in WP:FRINGE for such articles
*
▲* I used the same material in Wikipedia under CC by SA and in my online book under "all rights reserved" however Wikipedia's content license permits this form of dual licensing
If you feel I need to answer these or any other points in more detail, can I ask you to please wait for my response first before making any decisions, thanks.
| |||