User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19:
I may eventually return to content creation, perhaps microtonal[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales_project_proposal]. If so, my plan is to seek collaborators from the start, for encyclopedic tone, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc. However for now that's for other wikis and Wikinews where I collaborate with other editors for substantive content[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87].
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion, so I would like to respond to them for clarity
{{cot|Other points}}
* '''''I have never used Wikipedia for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion WP:PROMO]'''''. The main cite for Tune Smithy[http://deletionpedia.org/en/Tune_Smithy#References], Sound on Sound, is often used for notability in this topic area[https://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22sound+on+sound%22][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Making_Waves_(software)#References][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nord_Piano#References][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QSound#References]. I added COI statement[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Declaration_of_interest] once I found guidelines[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest].
* '''''I included a few sentences from a deleted section[https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Water+on+Mars&oldid=556727781&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Frobertinventor.com%2Fbooklets%2Fpresentdaymarshabitats.html],''''' in a kindle booklet[https://www.amazon.com/Places-Microbes-Lichens-Fumaroles-Bioreactors-ebook/dp/B014TB6S2O] under CC by SA[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_LicenseCreative]
* '''''The deleted article on Modern Mars Habitability summarized the cites in good faith''''' and did not present my views. Its title came from an astrobiology sub-session title<ref name=modernmarshabitability>[https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/abscicon2017/program-abstracts/topics/index.shtml#solarSystem Session Topics] - ArbSciCon 2017:
*Theme: Solar System Sites
Line 29 ⟶ 31:
*Topic: Modern Mars Habitability
*Summary:
{{quote|''"Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars."''}}</ref> and I summarized cites such as NASA<ref>Hamilton, V.E., Rafkin, S., Withers, P., Ruff, S., Yingst, R.A., Whitley, R., Center, J.S., Beaty, D.W., Diniega, S., Hays, L. and Zurek, R., [https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/reports/MEPAG%20Goals_Document_2015_v18_FINAL.pdf Mars Science Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities: 2015 Version].
{{quote|''"Goal I: determine if Mars ever supported life
* '''''The article on fringe medicine followed the guidelines''''' in WP:FRINGE for such articles ▼
* Objective A: ...[past life].
* Objective B: determine if environments with high potential for current habitability and expression of biosignatures contain evidence of extant life."''}}
'''''Please note''''' - I give this and the other cites solely to show that I was presenting views expressed by others and not myself. I am not trying to use these cites to try to say that Wikipedia has to present these views in Life on Mars, or indeed anywhere else, and I accept the community decision to delete this material.
</ref><ref name=Conley>{{cite news|last1=Chang|first1=Kenneth|title=Mars Is Pretty Clean. Her Job at NASA Is to Keep It That Way.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/science/mars-catharine-conley-nasa-planetary-protection-officer.html|agency=New York Times|date=October 5, 2015}}
Interview with Catherine Conley, NASA's Planetary protection officer[https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/people/1421/catharine-cassie-conley/] at the time
{{quote|''"The salts known as perchlorates that lower the freezing temperature of water at the R.S.L.s, keeping it liquid, can be consumed by some Earth microbes. “The environment on Mars potentially is basically one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms,” Dr. Conley said."''}}.</ref>, who I personally evaluate as the pre-eminent [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources WP:RS] on Mars astrobiology. .I accept consensus to delete it. Just to clarify intent.
▲* '''''The article on fringe medicine followed the guidelines''''' in WP:FRINGE for like other such articles[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease]
* '''''Wikipedia's content license permits dual licensing[https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-enter-into-separate-or-supplemental-agreements-with-users-of-my-work]<ref>''"It is legally possible to add more restrictions than the original license in some cases, for example, releasing a derivative work under all rights reserved which incorporates source materials licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license."'' [http://wikieducator.org/Creative_Commons_unplugged/Remix_and_compatibility#Compatibility_among_different_CC_licenses Compatibility among different CC licenses]</ref>''''', the same material in Wikipedia under CC by SA and in my online book[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/If_humans_touch_Mars.htm] under "all rights reserved"
Thank you for your time in considering this appeal.
| |||