User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*Summary: |
*Summary: |
||
{{quote|Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars.}} |
{{quote|Recent discoveries on Mars, including recurring slope lineae, ground ice, and active gully formation, have been interpreted as indications for the transient presence of water. The potential for liquid water on Mars has profound implications for the habitability of the modern Mars environment. This session solicits papers that examine the evidence for habitable environments on Mars, present results about life in analogs to these environments, discuss hypotheses to explain the active processes, evaluate issues for planetary protection, and explore the implications for future explorations of Mars.}} |
||
</ref>. I added it a year and a half before the sanction debate. I publicized my intention first[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Life_on_Mars&diff=next&oldid=763652967]. It was not a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_forking#Point_of_view_(POV)_forks WP:POVFORK] when I created it. It expanded on the main article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Life_on_Mars&oldid=798021656], which at the time presented the POV of NASA as the mainstream view. The main article remained like that for three quarters of a year [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Life_on_Mars&diff=prev&oldid=809949468], and anyone with an interest in the topic would have had it on their watch list. |
</ref>. I added it a year and a half before the sanction debate. I publicized my intention first[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Life_on_Mars&diff=next&oldid=763652967]. It was not a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_forking#Point_of_view_(POV)_forks WP:POVFORK] when I created it. It expanded on the main article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Life_on_Mars&oldid=798021656], which at the time presented the POV of NASA as the mainstream view. The main article remained like that for three quarters of a year [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Life_on_Mars&diff=prev&oldid=809949468], and anyone with an interest in the topic would have had it on their watch list. It had numerous cites and I summarized what they said to the best of my ability, not my own views.[http://deletionpedia.org/en/Modern_Mars_habitability] |
||
The deleted article had numerous cites. It could be challenged on whether my cite of NASA's objectives for Mars exploration is a sufficiently notable cite, but I did summarize what they said accurately as anyone can check by reading it. From the deleted article[http://deletionpedia.org/en/Modern_Mars_habitability]: |
|||
{{quote|It relates to the "Objective B" of NASA's first Mars Science Goal:<ref>Hamilton, V.E., Rafkin, S., Withers, P., Ruff, S., Yingst, R.A., Whitley, R., Center, J.S., Beaty, D.W., Diniega, S., Hays, L. and Zurek, R., [https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/reports/MEPAG%20Goals_Document_2015_v18_FINAL.pdf Mars Science Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities: 2015 Version].</ref> |
|||
:"Goal I: determine if Mars ever supported life |
|||
:* Objective A: determine if environments having high potential for prior habitability and preservation of biosignatures contain evidence of past life. |
|||
:* Objective B: determine if environments with high potential for current habitability and expression of biosignatures contain evidence of extant life."}} |
|||
{{cob}} |
{{cob}} |
||
* '''''Adding a page about my own software in 2008 as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion WP:PROMO].''''' I added this after a review in Sound on Sound, often used as a reliable source in Wikipedia[https://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22sound+on+sound%22]. When I found the guidelines on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest WP:COI] in 2011, I added a declaration of interest to my talk page[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Declaration_of_interest] and the article talk page. There was no commercial intent there. |
* '''''Adding a page about my own software in 2008 as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion WP:PROMO].''''' I added this after a review in Sound on Sound, often used as a reliable source in Wikipedia[https://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22sound+on+sound%22]. When I found the guidelines on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest WP:COI] in 2011, I added a declaration of interest to my talk page[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Declaration_of_interest] and the article talk page. There was no commercial intent there. |
||
