User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25:
(200 words)
----
As for the rest of the charges, I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. The problem I have here is that the main thing I did "wrong" according to the unblock debate was to defend my Modern Mars Habitability article from being deleted which they say ascalled [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CHEESE WP:CHEESE] in the debate[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855483230]. If I could agree with that unblock is simple. But what do you do if youI can't agreefor withreasons that?I'll explain. This is my best try:
 
* '''''Contributing an article in March 2017 that contradicts statements in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855483230] For another perspective on why I defended it from deletion, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] about planetary protection for Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I understand that the final decision of the Wikipedia community is that material that contradicts that section[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] should be deleted. However please don't make it an unblock requirement that I have to say that NASA's views are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CHEESE WP:CHEESE].
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own: