User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27:
I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. Though there was a consensus to block me, there was no consensus in the debate about what I was charged with. I will choose what seem to be the top three charges, and answer them as best I can, but please bear in mind I do not wish to edit in these areas any more.
* '''''Contributing an article in March 2017 that contradicts statements in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855483230] For another perspective on why I defended it from deletion, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] about planetary protection for Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. It is true that Wikipedia says that the Mars surface is known to be sterile[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects], and that my article was deleted because it contradicted this statement in Life on Mars.
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own:
| |||