User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. Though there was a consensus to block me, there was no consensus in the debate about what I was charged with. I will choose what seem to be the top three charges, and answer them as best I can, but please bear in mind I do not wish to edit in these areas any more. |
I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. Though there was a consensus to block me, there was no consensus in the debate about what I was charged with. I will choose what seem to be the top three charges, and answer them as best I can, but please bear in mind I do not wish to edit in these areas any more. |
||
* '''''Contributing an article in March 2017 that contradicts statements in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855483230] For another perspective on why I defended it from deletion, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] about planetary protection for Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I fully acknowledge here that Wikipedia says that the Mars surface is known to be sterile[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects], that my article was deleted because it contradicted this statement in Life on Mars, and that in the AfD, Wikipedia editors decided by consensus that Wikipedia shouldn't cover |
* '''''Contributing an article in March 2017 that contradicts statements in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855483230] For another perspective on why I defended it from deletion, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] about planetary protection for Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I fully acknowledge here that Wikipedia says that the Mars surface is known to be sterile[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects], that my article was deleted because it contradicted this statement in Life on Mars, and that in the AfD, Wikipedia editors decided by consensus that Wikipedia shouldn't cover the POV that there could be present day surface Mars organisms. However, please don't make it an additional unblock requirement that I have to say that NASA's views are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CHEESE WP:CHEESE], thanks! |
||
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own: |
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own: |
||
