User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 51:
{{cot|Additional charges}}
Although there were many charges, please note the dates. Only the Buddhism topic ban appeal and my attempt to defend the Modern Mars Habitability article from deletion were new. They were connected too, the article deletion was a result of my response to a request to share my best work outside of the Buddhism topic area[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=854845184]. I shared the article on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_protection Planetary Protection] which is mainly my work[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Planetary_protection] and it all follwed from that.
* '''''Publishing part of a user space draft under a non free content license in 2017''''' Some editors were unaware that Wikipedia's license specifically permits dual licensing[https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-enter-into-separate-or-supplemental-agreements-with-users-of-my-work]. As author, I can release my content under CC by SA for Wikipedia, as an act of generosity on my part, and use the same content under a non free license elsewhere. This is what I did with some sections of my book released in 2017[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/If_humans_touch_Mars.htm]
* '''''Using Wikipedia to promote my blog and give it credibility'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855490367] It was the other way around. When the content I wrote was deleted I started a new blog and told my readers that it was rejected from Wikipedia[https://www.science20.com/robert_inventor/blog/mars_sample_receiving_facility_and_sample_containment-116050]. That could hardy be further from using Wikipedia to give my blog credibility! I never linked to my blog from Wikipedia articles.
* '''''That I disrupt the planetary protection article significantly'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=855610686] Other editors are satisfied with the edits I made to it, and have made only small changes to this article since my indef block [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planetary_protection&type=revision&diff=880916715&oldid=855602798]. Most of its current content was written by me[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Planetary_protection] - added 56,440 bytes and deleted 11,761 in an article that is now 69,886 bytes.
* '''''Adding material on a topic in fringe medicine in 2015'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855532245] Such articles are permitted, and they not required to follow [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine) WP:MEDRS], see for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease]. The article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802] followed the guidelines in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE]. My last comment on this topic was in September 2016 [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/1/Morgellons].
* '''''That I was taken to ANI five times for the Buddhism sanctions'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855532245]. None of those were topic ban breaches. Three of these were failed attempts to ban me[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=775557776][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive869#Disruptive_talkpage_behaviour][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive869#Disruptive_talkpage_behaviour]. I had one limited topic ban, an extended topic ban, then a failed topic ban appeal. After what happened after the last appeal, I have no intention to appeal again.
| |||