User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27:
As for the rest of the charges, I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again].
 
* '''''Contributing an article in March 2017 that contradicts statements[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.''''' I accept the final decision of the Wikipedia community that this material was removed. PleaseHowever though,the don'tdeleted requirematerial meexpressed the views of NASA, to saythe thatbest thisof materialmy isability, [https://ennot mine.wikipedia.org/wiki/ I can apologize for verbosity in the deletion debate but I can't apologize for adding my own views to Wikipedia:CHEESE, WP:CHEESE].because I didn't do that. For another persepctiveperspective, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] about planetary protection for Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview] and so represents the official view of NASA. It is their views, not mine, that contradict what Wikipedia says.
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own: