|
|
|
As for the rest of the charges, I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. I think I do have to answer these three though:
* '''''ContributingI anagree articlethat init Marchwas 2017the thatcommunity decision to supporet the contradicts statements[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.''''' I acceptcan't thesupport finalthi decisionaction ofmyself the Wikipedia community thatbecause this material was removed. I can apologize for verbosity indeleted the deletion debate[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view However,WP:POV] Iof can't apologize for adding my own views to WikipediaNASA, becausenot I didn't do thatmine. To check this for yourself, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] about planetary protection for Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview] and so represents the official view of NASA. Although I can't support the decision to remove this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:POV] from Wikipedia, I can agree not to edit in this area unless this editing policy changes.
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own:
|