|
|
|
(200 words)
----
As for the rest of the charges, I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. From the discussion itself however, I think I do have to answer these three thoughcharges:
* '''''I agree that it was the community decision to supporetsupport the statements in Life on Mars[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.''''' I can't support thi action myself because this deleted the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:POV] of NASA from Wikipedia, not minemy own views. To check this for yourself, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] about planetary protection for Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview] and so represents the official view of NASA.
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own:
|