User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

The deleted article[http://deletionpedia.org/en/Modern_Mars_habitability] had numerous cites. It summarized what the cites said to the best of my ability, not my own views.

{{cob}}

{{cot|Details}} I had multiple reasons for considering it notable. As well as that review, it is referenced in a notable book on microtonality with 554 cites in Google scholar[https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=18360403027930205731&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en]. It is also referenced in 17 other cites in Google Scholar[https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Tune+Smithy%22]. Google scholar is an accepted way to investigate notability[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Search_engine_test#Specific_uses_of_search_engines_in_Wikipedia]. Many years before the sanction debate it was modified substantially by other editors, with no suggestions to delete it. You are not required to delete an article when you discover rules on COI, just declare your connection.

{{cob}}

 

If I answer the remaining charges, it will take this well over the recommended 500 word limit, and it is already slightly over, so I will collapse them. There was no consensus in the debate about what I was indef blocked for, so I have no idea which of these I need to answer, if any. Please note the dates - though many charges were made they were based on my editing history going back for a decade and not a result of new activity on my part.