User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

* '''''I agree that it was the community decision to support statements in Life on Mars[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] that the Mars surface is known to be sterile and to delete my article for contradicting it[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459].''''' Please don't require me to support this action myself, because it deleted the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:POV] of NASA from Wikipedia. To check this for yourself, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] where NASA talk about their planetary proteciton measures for present day Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview] and so represents the official view of NASA. She says for instance "".

* '''''ThatIt is true that I was taken to ANI five times for the Buddhism sanctions'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855532245]. None of those were topic ban breaches.However, Threethree of these were failed attempts to ban me[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=775557776][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive869#Disruptive_talkpage_behaviour][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive869#Disruptive_talkpage_behaviour]. I had one limited topic ban, an extended topic ban, then a failed topic ban appeal, and that's it. After what happened after the last appeal, I have no intention to appeal again.

* '''''ContributedI materialdid tomake Wikipediaone thatmistake waswhich mistakenanother editor corrected[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Perigean_spring_tide#Confusing_first_paragraph], and includedI did include a quote in a footnote'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855691579] - I did make one mistake[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Perigean_spring_tide#Confusing_first_paragraph] butHowever thismistakes isare permitted under [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold WP:BOLD]. The quote in the footnote[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hawking_radiation&diff=prev&oldid=852418447] is permitted as an aid to readers, and is still there in the latest version of the article. The editor who claimed I acted improperly hasn't edited the article to 'fix' this [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Yakushima/0/Hawking_radiation].

* '''''OffI did take part in an off wiki discussion of the possibility of low cost lunar platinum in the construction industry like copper'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855691579] - thehowever there are no requirements here about what is permitted in off wiki discussions. The potential for high grade platinum ore from the Moon is mainstream in lunar colonization studies[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/205/1][https://theconversation.com/why-we-should-mine-the-moon-34285][http://www.thespacereview.com/article/555/1]. My idea that it could become as cheap as copper was just a fun speculative thought based on ideas for greatly reducing lunar export costs[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_the_Moon#Launch_costs]. It is a half remembered conversation years ago in a forum or comments area and nothing to do with Wikipedia editing.