|
As for the rest of the charges, I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. From the discussion itself however, I think I do have to answer these three charges:
* '''''IThe agreecommunity that itdecision was the community decision to delete my article for saying that Mars is not known to be sterile and for quoting: "The environment on Mars potentially is basically one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459].''''' This is what isthe referredsanction todebate ascalls [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CHEESE WP:CHEESE] in the sanction debate. However, the deletedit is NASA's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:POV] is that of NASA. To check this for yourself, please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video], the third one on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. TheThat NASA spokeswoman in that video is also the author of the quote about a giant dinner plate for Earth organisms<ref name=Conley>{{cite news|last1=Chang|first1=Kenneth|title=Mars Is Pretty Clean. Her Job at NASA Is to Keep It That Way.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/science/mars-catharine-conley-nasa-planetary-protection-officer.html|agency=New York Times|date=October 5, 2015}}
{{quote|"The salts known as perchlorates that lower the freezing temperature of water at the R.S.L.s, keeping it liquid, can be consumed by some Earth microbes. “The environment on Mars potentially is basically one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms,” Dr. Conley said."}} </ref>, not me. I can't supportagree thisnot communityto decision,edit andWikipedia votedto againstinclude NASA's itPOV, but I willcan't notagree editthat this topicwas inthe right decision and was the futureonly unlessperson someonewho elsevoted reversesagainst it.
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own:
|