User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27:
As for the rest, I don't have much to go on with the closing statement: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. However I think that I probably can't be unblocked without saying something about the Mars deletion debate, and the charges of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion WP:PROMO], and commercial use of Wikipedia content.
* '''''I accept the community decision to delete my article'''''. However I can't support the reason given in the AfD to delete it, that articles in Wikipedia have to say that the surface of Mars is known to be sterile[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459]. The view that it could potentially host Mars organisms is NASA's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view WP:POV]. To check this, watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video], third on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. Please respect my oppose vote in the debate as sincere. However, I will not attempt to edit Wikipedia to include NASA'S views on this matter if unblocked.
{{cot|Details}}This is further supporting evidence that I was expressing NASA's views to the best of my ability, not my own:
| |||