User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal supplemental: Difference between revisions
User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal supplemental (edit)
Revision as of 17:34, 21 April 2019
, 5 years ago→Planetary protection
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 132:
skip to [[#Wikipedia content in a kindle booklet|Wikipedia content in a kindle booklet]]
'''CHARGE''': I disrupt this topic significantly[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=855610686]
'''TRUE SITUATION''': Other editors are satisfied with the edits I made to the mainspace Planetary Protection article and have made only small changes to this article since my indef block [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planetary_protection&type=revision&diff=880916715&oldid=855602798 diff]]. Most of its current content was written by me[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Planetary_protection].
Line 138:
Click on '''Details''' to find out more.
{{cot|Details}}
This was given as an example of "Some topics he disrupts significantly"
Until I was indef blocked I was the [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/0/Planetary_protection main editor of the main space Planetary Protection article]. Added 56,440 bytes and deleted 11,761 in an article that is now 69,886 bytes.
Line 349:
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive280#Topic_ban_requested 2016] "You are banned for six months from the topic of the Four Noble Truths on all pages of Wikipedia including talk" [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARobertinventor&diff=prev&oldid=724350336 diff]]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive953#Editing_behavior_of_Robert_Walker 2017 again] "Per consensus, Robertinventor is indefinitely topic-banned from articles or edits associated with Buddhism, broadly construed and subject to the standard exceptions."
Line 362:
skip to [[#Contributed material that other Wikipedia editors corrected|Contributed material that other Wikipedia editors corrected]]
'''CHARGE''': I was accused[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855532245] of disruptive behaviour for adding an article on the topic of the possible association of Morgellons with the spirochetes that cause chronic Lyme disease and of problems of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)WP:MEDRS]
'''TRUE SITUATION''': The merged away article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802] states that it is fringe science as its first sentence, clearly explains that the research has limited support, and followed all the guidelines for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE]. Fringe articles on medicine are not required to follow [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)WP:MEDRS], see for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease].
Line 370:
Click on '''Details''' to find out more.
{{cot|Details}}
This is another reason given for sanctioning me
The history is that I contributed this article in 2015, after discussion on the talk page of the main article when one of the editors there [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Morgellons&diff=655358056&oldid=655261597 said]
| |||