User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia minor fixes examples: Difference between revisions
User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia minor fixes examples (edit)
Revision as of 15:23, 19 May 2019
, 5 years ago→Other editor said to go ahead and do it (but only noticed after block)
Line 75:
===Other editor said to go ahead and do it (but only noticed after block)===
# [[Wikipedia:Talk:2012_(film)#Most scientifically flawed and absurd science fiction film ever made]] - that it should mention that NASA voted it the most scientifically flawed film ever made, in a conference held at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, in 2011. However, I would comment saying that my suggestion was a mistake. Though widely publicized at the time, in many sources that you'd think were reasonably accurate, it seems that no such vote took place. The Guardian took down its story after being informed by NASA that they have not been involved in the creation of any such list<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/jan/05/nasa-2012-flawed-science-fiction Nasa names 2012 most absurd science-fiction film of all time ]{{quote|"This article was taken down on 19 January 2011 after Nasa informed us that the organisation had not been involved in the creation of any list of the least scientifically accurate science-fiction films."}}</ref>
# [[Wikipedia:Talk:Goldfish#Perhaps_should_menion:_popular_belief_that_the_common_goldfish_is_the_only_animal_that_can_see_both_infrared_and_ultraviolet_light]] To mention popular belief about goldfish and that it is incorrect, with cites
# [[Wikipedia:Talk:Great_Oxygenation_Event#Was_the_great_oxygenation_event_a_mass_extinction?]] Should mention evidence for a mass extinction is not strong, with cites, similar edit for [[Wikipedia:Talk:Extinction_event#Was_the_great_oxygenation_event_a_mass_extinction?]]
| |||