User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia minor fixes examples: Difference between revisions

Line 78:
# [[Wikipedia:Talk:Great_Oxygenation_Event#Was_the_great_oxygenation_event_a_mass_extinction?]] Should mention evidence for a mass extinction is not strong, with cites, similar edit for [[Wikipedia:Talk:Extinction_event#Was_the_great_oxygenation_event_a_mass_extinction?]]
# [[Wikipedia:Talk:Goldfish#Perhaps should menion: popular belief that the common goldfish is the only animal_that can see both infrared and ultraviolet light]] To mention popular belief about goldfish and that it is incorrect, with cites
# [[Wikipedia:Talk:2012_(film)#Most scientifically flawed and absurd science fiction film ever made]] - I suggested that it should mention that NASA voted it the most scientifically flawed film ever made, in a conference held at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, in 2011 and another editor said to go ahead.<br><br>However, I wouldsince comment sayingfound that, my suggestion was a mistake. Thoughthough widely publicized at the time, in many sources that you'd think were reasonably accurate, it seems that no such vote took place. Thethe Guardian took down its story after being informed by NASA that they have not been involved in the creation of any such list<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/jan/05/nasa-2012-flawed-science-fiction Nasa names 2012 most absurd science-fiction film of all time ]{{quote|"This article was taken down on 19 January 2011 after Nasa informed us that the organisation had not been involved in the creation of any list of the least scientifically accurate science-fiction films."}}</ref>. So I would post saying sorry I was mistaken.
 
===Mid discussion===