Mars Sample Receiving Faclity: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 40:
This page covers the results of studies by NASA and the ESA which examine the need for such a facility, and the risks that need to be mitigated. It also looks into issues of sample containment during return from Mars.
 
Note that [[User:Robertinventor/Discussion of science value of a Mars sample return | Some exobiologists believe that more in situ observation is needed first for practical reasons and reasons of cost benefit]]. There are also [[User:Robertinventor/Dissenting views on Mars sample return back contamination risks | minority view dissenters]] who disagree with the proposed plans. Zubrin considers them to be too cautious and the ICAMSR consider that stronger precautions are required.
 
==Plans to return a sample to Earth before detailed examination==
Line 360:
==See also==
 
* [[User:Robertinventor/Mars Sample Return Legal Issues and International Public Debate|Mars Sample Return Legal Issues and International Public Debate]].
 
* [[User:Robertinventor/Discussion of science value of a Mars sample return |Discussion of science value of a Mars sample return]] - relevant to decisions about whether or not to proceed with the mission
 
* [[User:Robertinventor/Dissenting views on Mars sample return back contamination risks|Dissenting views on Mars sample return back contamination risks]] for the views of Zubrin and the ICAMSR on this debate.
 
==References==
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu