User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33:
* '''''Using Wikipedia to promote my blog''''' It was the other way around. I started my blog to host material deleted from Wikipedia. I explain this to readers of my blog. I never linked to my blog from Wikipedia.
To answer the remaining charges would take this well over the 500 word limit. I have however provided responses in my astrobiology wiki. They also are all mistaken.
If you reject this appeal for its length, please give some indication of what I am indef blocked for, so that I can do a shorter appeal in the future. ▼
▲If you reject this appeal for its length, please give some indication of what I am indef blocked for, so that I can do a shorter appeal in the future.
I will not edit in the Mars astrobiology area unless a major change occurs to permit NASA's views to be presented here
As I see it, you have lost a content creator in those topic areas. At any rate I am not returning to these topics. My main wish is to fix the many minor and sometimes major errors I find when searching for material in Wikipedia. I also wish to return to the many things that need to be fixed listed in my Microtonal Project proposal, which has twelve support votes.
▲I will not edit in the Mars astrobiology area unless a major change occurs to permit NASA's views to be presented here even though they contradict statements in Life on Mars. I will not appeal the Buddhism topic ban again. The previous appeal was an attempt to get unblocked to edit in a topic as far removed from Dorje108's deleted content as it is possible to be. When that appeal failed in a major way it was clear that I can never be unblocked here, again unless something major happens to permit the topic of the deleted material to be covered here.
| |||
