User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17:
All issues of verbosity were due to talk page responses after these bold deletions. The comments were not off topic. This is not likely to happen again if I take these precautions. I will continue to work on reducing my word count in talk page conversations.
{{cot|Details}}
* I will use the sandbox to reduce word count - see the note to myself at the head of the talk page.
* I will monitor how often I post. In a debate with multiple editors, I will make sure others have plenty of time to respond between my responses and not try to reply to all the main points myself if others might do so.
* I will be careful not to do multiple responses to a single post by someone else.
{{cob}}
----
Line 24 ⟶ 29:
* '''''Adding my own views to Wikipedia, contradicting statements by the main editor of Life on Mars that Mars is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459 diff].''''' Before deciding if the deleted article[http://deletionpedia.org/en/Modern_Mars_habitability] expressed my views or those of NASA, please watch this one and a half minute video[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI]. It is third on the overview page of the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview].
{{cot|
{{quote|"The salts known as perchlorates that lower the freezing temperature of water at the R.S.L.s, keeping it liquid, can be consumed by some Earth microbes. “The environment on Mars potentially is basically one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms,” Dr. Conley said."}} </ref>, not me. The title of the deleted article came from an astrobiology conference sub session<ref name=modernmarshabitability>[https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/abscicon2017/program-abstracts/topics/index.shtml#solarSystem Session Topics] - ArbSciCon 2017:
Line 37 ⟶ 42:
{{cob}}
* '''''Adding a page about my own software as WP:PROMO.''''' I added this in 2008 after a review in Sound on Sound, often used as a reliable source in Wikipedia[https://www.google.com/search?q=site:en.wikipedia.org+%22sound+on+sound%22].
{{cot|
{{cob}}
* '''''Selling Wikipedia content on kindle''''' It was only a few sentences from a deleted section[https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Water+on+Mars&oldid=556727781&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Frobertinventor.com%2Fbooklets%2Fpresentdaymarshabitats.html]. Editors in the debate were unaware that Wikipedia's license permits commercial use[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_LicenseCreative]. I released the booklet in 2015 under the correct license and attributed Wikipedia with a link back following their guidelines[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/presentdaymarshabitats.html]
| |||
