User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51:
 
I can answer all the remaining charges too. They also are mistaken. However this would take this well over the recommended 500 word limit, and it is already slightly over. I have provided responses in my astrobiology wiki[https://encyclopediaofastrobiology.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor/Unblock_appeal_supplemental].
 
If you reject this appeal for its length, please give some indication of what I am indef blocked for, so that I can do a shorter appeal in the future. Thanks!
 
I have no wish to edit in the Mars astrobiology area in the future, or to attempt a second Buddhism topic ban appeal, unless there are major changes in how those topics are presented in Wikipedia. Instead I edit Dorje108's new Encyclopedia of Buddhism[https://encyclopediaofbuddhism.org], and my new Encyclopedia of Astrobiology[https://encyclopediaofastrobiology.org], both based on material deleted from Wikipedia. As I see it, you have lost two content creators (myself and Dorje108) in those topic areas.
Line 57 ⟶ 59:
 
I also wish to return to many things in the "to do" list for my Microtonal Project proposal[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales#Examples_of_things_we_could_do], which has twelve support votes[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales#Support].
 
If you reject this appeal for its length, please give some indication of what I am indef blocked for, so that I can do a shorter appeal in the future. Thanks!
}}
 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu