User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30:
I will answer the top five charges briefly
 
* '''''Contributing an article that contradicts statements in Life on Mars[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459 diff], and defending the material in the AfD.''''' BeforeThe youvoters usein the AfD concluded thesefrom statements in Wikipedia to deduce that NASA must knowknows that Mars is sterile. Before you do this, please watch this one and a half minute NASA video[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI] about why NASA sterilizes spacecraft to protect searches for present day (extant) Mars organisms. It is third on the overview page of the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I defended the deleted article because it presented their views, not mine.
{{cot|Details}}NASA's planetary protection officer is also the author of the quote in that diff about Mars being a giant dinner plate for Earth organisms<ref name=Conley>{{cite news|last1=Chang|first1=Kenneth|title=Mars Is Pretty Clean. Her Job at NASA Is to Keep It That Way.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/science/mars-catharine-conley-nasa-planetary-protection-officer.html|agency=New York Times|date=October 5, 2015}}
 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu