User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30:
I will answer the top five charges briefly
 
* '''''Contributing an article that contradicts statements in Life on Mars[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and vigorously attempting to defend the material from deletion.''''' I think I have to answer this although I have no wish to return to this topic in Wikipedia. Please don't use Wikipedia as your only source. For another perspective please watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI NASA video by Cassie Conley] and listen to what she says about Mars organisms. That's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I defendedwas so vigorous in my defence of the deleted article because it presented NASA's views, not mine, and I felt it was outrageous to delete their views from Wikipedia.
{{cot|Details}}NASA's planetary protection officer is also the author of the quote in that diff about Mars being a giant dinner plate for Earth organisms<ref name=Conley>{{cite news|last1=Chang|first1=Kenneth|title=Mars Is Pretty Clean. Her Job at NASA Is to Keep It That Way.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/science/mars-catharine-conley-nasa-planetary-protection-officer.html|agency=New York Times|date=October 5, 2015}}
 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu