User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 56:
* '''''Adding material on a topic in fringe medicine in 2015''''' Such articles are permitted, and they not required to follow [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine) WP:MEDRS], see for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_Lyme_disease Chronic Lyme disease]. The article[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moregellons_Lyme_hypothesis&oldid=661359802] followed the guidelines in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories WP:FRINGE]. My last comment on this topic was in [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Robertinventor/1/Morgellons September 2016].
* '''''That I was taken to ANI five times for the Buddhism sanctions'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855532245]. None of those were topic ban breaches. Three of these were failed attempts to ban me, like this one[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive951#Request_for_renewed_topic-ban 2017].
* '''''Contributed material to Wikipedia that was mistaken and including a quote in a footnote'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855691579] - I did make one mistake[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Perigean_spring_tide#Confusing_first_paragraph] but this is permitted under [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold WP:BOLD]. The otherquote 'mistake'in identifiedthe therefootnote[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hawking_radiation&diff=prev&oldid=852418447] is permitted and is still there in the latest version of the article,. and nobodyThe haseditor who claimed I acted improperly hasn'correctedt edited the article to 'fix' it [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/wYakushima/0/index.php?title=Hawking_radiation&diff=prev&oldid=852418447 edits by user].
* '''''Off wiki discussion of possibility of low cost lunar platinum in the construction industry like copper'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855691579] - the topic of high quality low cost platinum from the Moon is mainstream[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/205/1][https://theconversation.com/why-we-should-mine-the-moon-34285][http://www.thespacereview.com/article/555/1]. The idea that it could become as cheap as copper is highly speculative based on ideas for greatly reducing lunar export costs[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_the_Moon#Launch_costs] and I discussed it for fun in this half remembered conversation years ago. It was nothing to do with Wikipedia editing; I didn't even know he was a Wikipedia editor..
 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu