User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 26:
(226 words)
----
If I only answer correct charges, that's my complete appeal. The rest are mistaken. I don't know what I am expected to answer as the closing admin just wrote: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again]. Though there was a consensus to block me, thereThere was no consensus about what I was sanctioned for.
 
However I think I do have to answer some of the mistaken charges to get unblocked. I will answer what may be the top three charges briefly.
 
* '''''Contributing an article in March 2017 that contradicts statements in Life on Mars[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.''''' Please don't use Wikipedia as your only source. For another perspective watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] and listen to what their planetary protection officer says about Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I defended it from deletion in an attempt to prevent removal from Wikipedia of NASA's views on extant Martian life.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu