User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 28:
If I only answer correct charges, that's my complete appeal. There was no consensus about what I was sanctioned for, and the closing admin just wrote: ''"Closing with a consensus towards an indef block, plus my own admin judgment in that direction"''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=855723651#User:Robertinventor,_again].
 
However, though I have no intention to return to Mars astrobiology, I probably have to answer that charge to be unblocked and I've answered a couple of others that may be required:.
 
AlthoughThough there were many charges, they pleasewere noteabout content added long before the datesdebate. Only the Buddhism topic ban appeal was new,. andThe theMars article deletion was deleted as a result of mya responserequest toin athat requestappeal to shareshow my best work outside of the Buddhism topic area[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=854845184].
 
* '''''Contributing an article in March 2017 that contradicts statements in Life on Mars that the Mars surface is known to be sterile [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FModern_Mars_habitability&diff=prev&oldid=855472459], and defending it from deletion.'''''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=prev&oldid=855483230] When you assess whether this material was [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CHEESE WP:CHEESE], please don't use the section[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_on_Mars#Cumulative_effects] in Wikipedia as your only source. For another perspective watch this short (less than two minutes) [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk-Ycp5llEI official NASA video] and listen to what their planetary protection officer says about Mars organisms. It's the third video on the main overview page for the NASA Office of Planetary Protection[https://planetaryprotection.nasa.gov/overview]. I was attempting to prevent removal from Wikipedia of NASA's views, not mine.
Line 51 ⟶ 53:
 
{{cot|Additional charges}}
Although there were many charges, please note the dates. Only the Buddhism topic ban appeal was new, and the article deletion was a result of my response to a request to share my best work outside of the Buddhism topic area[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=854845184].
 
* '''''Publishing part of a user space draft under a non free content license in 2017''''' Some editors were unaware that Wikipedia's license specifically permits dual licensing[https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-enter-into-separate-or-supplemental-agreements-with-users-of-my-work]. As author, I can release my content under CC by SA for Wikipedia, as an act of generosity on my part, and use the same content under a non free license elsewhere. This is what I did with some sections of my book released in 2017[http://robertinventor.com/booklets/If_humans_touch_Mars.htm]
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu