User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal5: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29:
I may eventually return to content creation, perhaps microtonal[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor#Microtonal_Music,_Tuning,_Temperaments_and_Scales_project_proposal]. If so, my plan is to seek collaborators from the start, for encyclopedic tone, WP:RS, WP:NPOV etc. However for now that's for other wikis and Wikinews where I collaborate with other editors for substantive content[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87].
There seems to have been a fair bit of confusion in the discussion and I think I need to clarify a few points.
* I have never used Wikipedia for WP:PROMO. I used a source that is often used to establish notability in the topic area.
* I used a couple of sentences of a deleted article in a booklet I sold on kindle, but that is permitted as I attributed it correctly.
* I did not add my own views to Wikipedia, but summarized the cites to the best of my ability, and the main cites for my article were review level and ones that I considered to be of the highest reliability in my topic area.
* I did add an article on fringe medicine, but I followed the guidelines in WP:FRINGE for such articles as well as the model of another fringe medicine article here in Wikipedia.
* I did not copy blog posts into Wikipedia, instead I copied deleted material and drafts into my blog, telling the reader that they were deleted.
| |||