Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Astrobiology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
Line 34: Line 34:
With that background in mind:
With that background in mind:


* Will proceed more like scholarpedia where if someone contributes a good and substantial article, then they are treated as the main author and need to approve significant changes.
* Will proceed more like scholarpedia where if someone contributes a good and substantial article, then they are treated as the main author and need to approve significant changes, especially, mass deletion of material, or a major rewrite that changes the meaning of what they wrote.


* Similar also for collaborative articles. It's only me editing at present. But anyone can in join in working on it. Please respect existing content and and other authors.
* Similar also for collaborative articles. It's only me editing at present. But anyone can in join in working on it. The idea again is to respect content contributed by other editors.


* I don't think the voting method for Wikipedia works well with no overall vision.
* I don't think the voting method for Wikipedia works well with no overall vision.

Revision as of 16:19, 6 September 2018

Artist's impression of the Phoenix Lander landing on Mars.

Phoenix's atmospheric measurements of isotope ratios of carbon and oxygen gave evidence for liquid water on the surface now or in the recent geological past.[1]Also its 2008 observations of possible droplets on its legs suggested new ways that water could be stable temporarily on Mars.[2] These observations lead many scientists to reassess the present habitability of Mars
  1. Phoenix Mars Lander Finds Surprises About Planet’s Watery Past University of Arizona news, By Daniel Stolte, University Communications, and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory | September 9, 2010
  2. First liquid water may have been spotted on Mars, New Scientist, February 2009 by David Shiga
Select [►] to view subcategories (note work in progress, needs re-organization)

Some of the main pages are:

Astrobiology

Life on Mars

Life in other locations

Planetary protection

Guidelines

So, the idea was to set up a wiki where if you contribute a good astrobiology article it is safe from being arbitrarily deleted by people who know nothing about the topic. If you've wanted to make encyclopedic articles about astrobiology but find Wikipedia frustrating as an editor, this may be useful.

With that background in mind:

  • Will proceed more like scholarpedia where if someone contributes a good and substantial article, then they are treated as the main author and need to approve significant changes, especially, mass deletion of material, or a major rewrite that changes the meaning of what they wrote.
  • Similar also for collaborative articles. It's only me editing at present. But anyone can in join in working on it. The idea again is to respect content contributed by other editors.
  • I don't think the voting method for Wikipedia works well with no overall vision.

I'm admin and will be final authority if needed. Hopefully will be a friendly place :). Also on things like how to categorize pages, on what is and is not included etc.

Otherwise similar to wikipedia - mainspace articles to be reasonably encyclopaedic, please keep to well sourced statements.

Blogs

I've also set up a test blog, where one can post original research or opinions and points of views. , whatever one wants related to astrobiology:

The idea is you can put in your own user space and link to your blog from the main page.

Robertinventor (talk) 00:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.