User:Robertinventor/Unblock appeal8: Difference between revisions

I hope nobody doubts that I am a good faith editor. The deleted article was a good faith attempt to present views of others, not myself. E.g. ''"one giant dinner plate for Earth organisms"'' quotes NASA's planetary protection officer[http://deletionpedia.org/en/Modern_Mars_habitability#cite_ref-32], and the eutectics section describes work of Toner et al[http://deletionpedia.org/en/Modern_Mars_habitability#cite_ref-TonerCatling2014_29-1], which I forgot to cite in the previous sections. RatherI thannever cite myself, hererather, I remove such cites[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=820822757].

As per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_was_the_page_I_created_deleted%3F#If_all_else_fails,_try_another_wiki WP:OTHERWIKIS] the deleted content is in other wikis or blogs. I accept the consensus decision to delete it here. Iand will beavoid avoidingthose all the topic areas in which may content was previously deletedtopics.

AboutThe half thedeleted articles I made were deleted, which is clearly an issue. However these are articles whenones I worked on material '''''By myself''''' for a long time, with only help from wikignomes. That seems to be the main issue.

How can I prove that at least some of my content was okay? As an indef blocked editor I can't work onsubmit anything and submit it for "Good article" status. However thereI iscan give some evidence may be useful.

In the year before the block, I fixed over 90 articles[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20180731235959&limit=500&contribs=user&target=Robertinventor&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=&end=2018-07-31], with only 2 reverts[https://encyclopediaofastrobiology.org/wiki/User:Robertinventor/Wikipedia_minor_fixes_examples#Articles_to_fix]. INobody havehas aever tenraised year history of Wikignomingissues with nomy issues raisedwikignoming before the indef block.

I hope this is enough evidence to seeshow that I amcan an editor who isbe an asset to Wikipedia.

So,My howplan canto Iavoid returnissues without causing problems? I planis to do minor edits and corrections for six months., Afterand that, tothen work with collaborators from the start, as I do on Wikinews[https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:NASA%27s_InSight_Lander_makes_it_to_Mars][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Mysterious_dimming_of_Tabby%27s_star_likely_due_to_space_dust,_not_alien_superstructures,_say_scientists][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Simple_animals_could_live_in_Martian_brines:_Wikinews_interviews_planetary_scientist_Vlada_Stamenkovi%C4%87#Review_of_revision_4457552_%5BPassed%5D][https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Sun%27s_mood_swings_not_so_strange_after_all,_say_scientists]. Then we'd submit it for review as a Good Article, similarly to WikiNews.